The BCCI chief selector, Ajit Agarkar, has sparked a debate with his recent statement at the NDTV World Summit 2025, where he claimed, 'If Mohammed Shami Was Fit, He'd Be In The Team.' This comment comes in the wake of Shami's recent criticism of the BCCI selectors for excluding him from the white-ball tour of Australia. Shami, a fast bowler who has been a key player for India, has been struggling with recurring ankle and knee injuries that required surgery after the 2023 World Cup. While Agarkar acknowledged Shami's talent, he emphasized the importance of fitness, stating that if Shami were fit, he would have been selected for the team. This statement has ignited a discussion about the balance between talent and fitness in sports, and the role of selectors in making difficult decisions. The upcoming series in Australia, which includes three ODIs and a five-match T20I series, will be a crucial test for India's team selection and strategy. As the nation eagerly awaits the return of veteran players Rohit Sharma and Virat Kohli, the debate surrounding Shami's fitness and selection continues to captivate sports enthusiasts and fans alike. But here's where it gets controversial... What do you think, readers? Do you agree with Agarkar's statement, or do you believe that talent should always take precedence over fitness? Share your thoughts in the comments below!
